What Can Democrats Learn From Alabama’s Doug Jones?

  • 0
  • 30 November 2017

In ordinary circumstances, Doug Jones would already be preparing to move to Washington DC. The former prosecutor famous for convicting KKK members for a church bombing is up against gay bashing, God and gun lovin’, twice kicked out of elected office, Judge Roy Moore. A man who has eight accusers of sexual assault, all of whom were underage at the time of the allegations.

Yet, if one looks at all the recent polls, they show a tight race. If the two candidates aren’t neck and neck, one or the other has the slenderest of leads. Many US commentators across the media even expect Moore to win.

Of course, Alabama is a deep red state, and Moore is the most right wing candidate to ever run on the GOP platform. Then again, Missouri was deep red when Claire McCaskill beat Todd Akin in 2012, after his ‘legitimate rape’ comment. So was Indiana, when Joe Donnelly snuck in that same year. In fact, there are a handful of other deep red states with Democrat senators, namely Montana, North Dakota and West Virginia.

Although a Democrat has not won statewide in Alabama for some twenty years, it isn’t the hardest thing to imagine this December. This is the easiest opportunity Democrats have had in a long time and could possibly wish to have.

Doug Jones represents a breed of American politician the Democrats need more of; red state Democrats. Simply put, they won’t win back either house of congress without them. In the long term, it saves their image from being the party of ‘coastal liberal elites’, which is precisely the problem.

Jones is a proud gun owner and hunter. He is running on a programme of strengthening the military and national defense. While an Obamacare supporter, he recently told Chuck Todd of MSNBC that he is ‘not there yet’ on single payer healthcare. He repeats the phrase ‘kitchen table issues’ to reporters at any chance he gets. Most importantly, however, he has almost entirely distanced himself from the Democrat Party in Washington.

Other than former Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. John Lewis, Jones has had no other high profile visitors on the campaign trail; it isn’t hard to see why. To win, he needs to form an odd coalition of voters to turn up and vote for him. Firstly, the African American base, where his background, opponent and John Lewis do him immense favours. However, he also needs suburban whites who voted for Trump but simply cannot stomach Moore. Enter Joe Biden.

This is particular to his state, but not uncommon for other red state Democrats. All of whom currently in the Senate (except McCaskill) distanced themselves from the Democrat Party in order to win. Instead of usual Democrat talking points, they preached about bi-partisanship, stressed their ‘local roots’ and ran as ‘local issue candidates’.

Beto O’Rourke who is challenging Ted Cruz in Texas next year is doing the same thing and faces a similar problem. Besides the Latino vote, he also needs suburban whites and Republicans fed up of Cruz to tick the box marked ‘Democrat’. O’Rourke has been to parts of Texas where no candidate for Senate has campaigned in for over forty years. He is refusing any PAC money, talks about bi-partisanship and claims that Texans deserve better than someone who ‘got elected [and] then went straight to Iowa’.

Here is the catch, though. O’Rourke is openly liberal. While more moderate, Jones is still very much in line with the Democrat platform. He is pro-choice, which has put off some key swing voters he desperately needs. Many Alabamians cannot conceive of voting for a Democrat, however impressive Jones’ record is.

That is why on the campaign trail Jones has been focusing solely on current issues rather than ideological ones. Attack ads can speak for themselves, but as Moore and the current president show, being scandal ridden isn’t enough of a disqualifier in 2017. Ironic though it may seem, ‘kitchen table’ issues are realistically the only thing Jones can do to help himself.

Jones and his campaign show that the Democrat’s brand needs some serious detoxification. This must begin in red states if Democrats are to win back any branches of government. To return to the point I began this piece with; Alabama’s special election should have been won weeks ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russian Security Cannot be Anti-Russian

  • 0
  • 15 March 2022

To reflect on the period where the world now finds itself, we propose the term “cold hot war”, as this period has significant differences from the classical notion of the “Cold war”. Within the framework of the old Cold War, military confrontation between the two superpowers was always indirect. “Proxy” conflicts only emerged between their respective allies, when there was an intersection of interests in various regions of the world, but these never happened direc

citește mai mult

Russian Leadership Changes: How it was, is and how it might be

  • 0
  • 3 January 2022

Now that 2022 is finally here, it means Russia’s next presidential election is just two years away. The way has been paved for Vladimir Putin to run again if he chooses. The will he/won’t he? question is a favourite of pundits as is speculation of a potential or likely successor. Russia’s next leader will be immensely consequential, as will the time when he or she takes over.

It’s certainly possible that by the end of t

citește mai mult

Researchers from Six Countries Discussed the Challenges for International Psychological Security in the Context of the Use of Artificial Intelligence

  • 0
  • 23 November 2020

On 12 November 2020, a panel discussion "Artificial Intelligence and International Psychological Security: Theoretical and Practical Implications" was held at St. Petersburg State University as part of the international conference "Strategic Communications in Business and Politics" (STRATCOM-2020).

The discussion was moderated by Konstantin Pantserev – DSc in Political Sciences, Professor of the St. Petersburg State University,

citește mai mult

Conferință despre Transnistria, 4 – 5 Martie 2022

  • 0
  • 8 March 2022

Împlinirea a 30 de ani de la unul dintre cele mai dificile momente ale istoriei estului Europei a constituit temeiul unei conferințe științifice de prestigiu organizate în colaborare de către instituții de învățâmânt și cercetare din Chișinău, Târgoviște și București.

Conferința cu titlul „Războiul de pe Nistru din 1992: 30 de ani după...” a fost organizată de către Asociația Națională a Tinerilor Istorici din Moldova (ANTIM),

citește mai mult

Forcing the Correct Choice: Deterring Right-Wing Radicals and Preventing Threats to Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine

  • 0
  • 7 March 2022

According to official statements by the Russian Federation, its army’s special military operation in Ukraine aims to both “demilitarize” and “denazify” the country. This operation is being carried out in a large state with a developed nuclear power industry, fairly powerful army (the largest in Europe outside of Russia and Turkey) and high firepower (22nd place in the world according to 2022 Military Strength Ranking (Global Firepower, 2022)). One of the primary o

citește mai mult

Azebaijan, cheia geostrategică a Asiei Centrale

  • 0
  • 13 February 2018

După destrămarea URSS, Azerbaijanul a fost statul ex-sovietic care alături de    republicile Baltice a avut o dezvoltare constantă și durabilă. Desigur, aici pot fi adresate unele critici regimului de la Baku cu privire la democrație, care în opinia multor analiști este doar mimată la Baku. Însă faptul adevărat este că acest stat a reușit să își gestioneze eficient resursele de care dispune pentru a deveni o societate prosperă. I se atribuie Azerbaijanului etichet

citește mai mult

Malicious Use of AI and Challenges to Psychological Security: Future Risks

  • 0
  • 20 May 2024

In April 2024, the International Center for Social and Political Studies and Consulting International Center for Social and Political Studies and Consulting with the help of the International Research Group on Threats to International Psychological Security through Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence (Research MUAI) published the report citește mai mult

Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges for BRICS Psychological Security on International Forum “Russia and Ibero-America in a Turbulent World: History and Prospects”

  • 0
  • 17 October 2023

On October 5, within the framework of the VI International Forum “Russia and Ibero-America in a Turbulent World: History and Modernity” at St. Petersburg State University, two sessions of the panel “Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges for BRICS Psychological Security” were held under the chairmanship of Professor Evgeny N. Pashentsev.

citește mai mult

Presentation of “The Palgrave Handbook of Malicious Use of AI and Psychological Security” at international forum in St. Petersburg

  • 0
  • 17 October 2023

On October 4, 2023, as part of the international forum "Russia and Iberoamerica in a Turbulent World: History and Modernity", held at the School of International Relations of St. Petersburg State University, the presentation of the collective monograph "The Palgrave Handbook of Malicious Use of AI and Psychological Security" took place. The presentation was attended by the editor and co-author of the publication – DSc., professor Evgeny Pashentsev, leading researc

citește mai mult