Does The Russian State Support Jeremy Corbyn?

  • Rusia
  • 0
  • 1 May 2018

Sunday 29 April 2018, 9 A.M., BBC One: Andrew Marr took the British public through the Sunday newspapers, as normal. The Sunday Times were reporting its research with Swansea University showing that ‘Russian bots’ tried to swing the 2017 General Election in Jeremy Corbyn’s favour. According to the report, 6,500 Twitter accounts were championing Labour and denigrating the Conservatives during the 2017 campaign.

This was almost reminiscent of post war Britain. In 1924, the Zinoviev telegram helped take down the first Labour government. Who would have believed tying Russia to the British Labour Party was possible after the USSR’s collapse?

Labour of the 1920s and early 1930s is no more. Once intrigued by the construction of socialism, many Labour MPs, like its first Prime Minister, Ramsay McDonald, visited the USSR. Their goal was to find information to reinforce their viewpoints and potentially serve as a model for policies. No serious person could imagine Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell or Diane Abbott travelling to Vladimir Putin’s Russia for those reasons.

So little binds Corbyn and Russia’s president. Yet, I do remember watching coverage on Rossiya 1 the day Corbyn was electedLabour leader. The reporter claimed that only one media outlet in Britain was fair to Corbyn: RT. Make of that what you will, but Corbyn never seemed liked a natural ally of Putin to even his most cynical opponents.

The Russian state is, of course, far different to its Soviet predecessor, as is its experience with Britain’s political parties. Moreover, it is far from obvious which political party has had a better relationship with Russia following the USSR’s collapse. Certainly, the relationship has gotten worse under David Cameron (Conservative, 2010 – 2017) and Theresa May (Conservative, 2017 – present). Yet, that does not necessarily make Tony Blair (Labour 1997 – 2007) or Gordon Brown (Labour, 2007 – 2010) any more successful.

John Major (Conservative, 1992 – 1997) backed Yeltsin’s economic reforms, the expansion of NATO and bombing of Kosovo. So too did Blair. All made Russia appear weak on the world stage whilst the state was unable to carry about basic functions at home. Major also attended the funeral of Boris Nemtsov in 2015, with whom he worked closely in the 1990s.

Blair was the first foreign leader to meet with and congratulate Putin on his victory. As Alastair Campbell revealed, Blair thought Putin was ‘someone we can work with’. The initial optimism never manifested, however.

Recalling the words of political analyst, Sergei Utkin, he suggested Labour would be not be the immediate favourite. Before the General Election 2015, Utkin told The Guardian: “In general the Conservatives are a known evil [in Russia], so even if our relations are not so good there will be an expectation that they won’t get any worse…” In case you missed it, that was an endorsement. Either way, the 2015 General Election was low down on Russia’s agenda. Most ordinary Russians do not care about British politics, either. Cameron was largely unknown, let alone Ed Miliband.

So, what is different about Corbyn and 2017?

Corbyn has not spent a lot of time discussing Russia. Or Putin for that matter. Never mind the average Briton, most Labour members could not explain the party’s current stance on Russia. Corbyn has recently said that he would do business with Putin, and challenge him on human rights. Moreover, his Shadow Chancellor, McDonnell, also proposed an ‘oligarch levy’ to hit Russian tax dodgers. But all of this came after the election.

May and the Conservatives are openly critical of the Russian state and its leadership. Both quickly pointed the finger at the Russian state and Putin over the Skripal poisoning. Corbyn condemned the attack, yet, did not rush to conclude who exactly was responsible – much to the displeasure of some in his party.

If the Russian state does support Corbyn, the reasons why will not be extensive. Corbyn and Putin are very different people. Their backgrounds’ are entirely different as is the way they see the world. I would elaborate, but anyone paying attention can figure out why. Furthermore, Putin has made no public comments about the Labour leader (to the best of our knowledge).

If (and it is a big if) the Russian state does support Corbyn, the most logical reason would be the chance of improving relations. Anglo – Russian relations are at their lowest point in living memory. As mentioned, this decline has only continued under Conservative governments since 2010.

The reality is that Russia and Britain need to have a good relationship – it is in both of their interests. British political parties are irrelevant to Russians and the Kremlin. Russia as a whole wants Britain’s Prime Minister to be someone who will help repair the damage.

When asked whether Russia preferred Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, Putin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, “whom would you prefer: the candidate who has been negative about your country or the one who has not?” This is precisely the point. Although he has not been flattering, neither has Corbyn gone out of his way to criticise Russia and Putin.

In the long term, that may prove a useful strategy. Firstly, Russia is not high on the British public’s priorities. Foreign policy is of little consequence in British general elections (see a previous article I wrote on this topic). Spending time on Russia is a pointless exercise for Corbyn.

With that being said, the next general election is Labour’s to lose. The press and most current MPs are expecting Corbyn to fail in government. Going into Downing Street on bad terms with Putin would not be an auspicious start.

It is anybody’s guess whether Corbyn and Putin would have a good relationship. There is certainly no reason to expect that they will (internet trolls included). Yet, the fact Corbyn has largely steered clear of Russia may give Russians a reason to be cautiously optimistic. But that is the most any reasonable person can assume.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russian Leadership Changes: How it was, is and how it might be

  • 0
  • 3 January 2022

Now that 2022 is finally here, it means Russia’s next presidential election is just two years away. The way has been paved for Vladimir Putin to run again if he chooses. The will he/won’t he? question is a favourite of pundits as is speculation of a potential or likely successor. Russia’s next leader will be immensely consequential, as will the time when he or she takes over.

It’s certainly possible that by the end of t

citește mai mult

Researchers from Six Countries Discussed the Challenges for International Psychological Security in the Context of the Use of Artificial Intelligence

  • 0
  • 23 November 2020

On 12 November 2020, a panel discussion "Artificial Intelligence and International Psychological Security: Theoretical and Practical Implications" was held at St. Petersburg State University as part of the international conference "Strategic Communications in Business and Politics" (STRATCOM-2020).

The discussion was moderated by Konstantin Pantserev – DSc in Political Sciences, Professor of the St. Petersburg State University,

citește mai mult


  • 0
  • 2 July 2020


This book  , edited by Evgeny Pashentsev, brings together a series of chapters written by Russian and non-Russian scholars

citește mai mult

Azebaijan, cheia geostrategică a Asiei Centrale

  • 0
  • 13 February 2018

După destrămarea URSS, Azerbaijanul a fost statul ex-sovietic care alături de    republicile Baltice a avut o dezvoltare constantă și durabilă. Desigur, aici pot fi adresate unele critici regimului de la Baku cu privire la democrație, care în opinia multor analiști este doar mimată la Baku. Însă faptul adevărat este că acest stat a reușit să își gestioneze eficient resursele de care dispune pentru a deveni o societate prosperă. I se atribuie Azerbaijanului etichet

citește mai mult

What Can Democrats Learn From Alabama’s Doug Jones?

  • 0
  • 30 November 2017

In ordinary circumstances, Doug Jones would already be preparing to move to Washington DC. The former prosecutor famous for convicting KKK members for a church bombing is up against gay bashing, God and gun lovin’, twice kicked out of elected office, Judge Roy Moore. A man who has eight accusers of sexual assault, all of whom were underage at the time of the allegations.

Yet, if one looks at all the recent polls, they show a ti

citește mai mult

Azerbaidjanul, petrolul și românii

  • 0
  • 7 October 2016

Întotdeauna, statele sunt nevoite să își apere poziția pe marea tablă a geopoliticii, uitându-se cu grijă la vecini, dar și la puterile regionale. Această regulă presupune nu doar poziția ofensivă, ci și valorificare atuurilor, astfel încât să devină piese care contează pe „câmpul de analiză”, iar nu elemente neglijabile, care sunt măturate dintr-o dată de cei ce au suficientă putere să mânuiască piesele.

Caucazul, ca regiune geopolitică, nu face nici ea excepție

citește mai mult

The US Strategic Provocations before and during the Olympic Games: The Stakes Are Growing

  • 0
  • 16 January 2022

Introduction. To make your foe act in a definite way through the planned escalation of events, thereby making him lose his position and his tangible and intangible assets – that is the essence of any international provocation. In history, one can find many examples of strategic provocations with long term goals and, very often, grave and long-term international consequences. The Gulf of Tonkin incident in August 1964 – where a North Vietnamese to

citește mai mult

Experts on the Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges to International Psychological Security (part III)

  • 0
  • 28 December 2021

The Questionnaire for Experts “Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges to Psychological Security”

 This questionnaire is a part of the research project “Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges to Psychological Security in Northeast Asia” funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, project number 21-514-92001. citește mai mult

Experts on the Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence and Challenges to International Psychological Security (part II)

  • 0
  • 17 December 2021

  1. Which of the threats to international psychological security caused by the malicious use of artificial intelligence do you consider the most relevant for your country?

  Vian Bakir and Andrew McStay Surreptitious influencing via psychological manipulation on social media is a real threat in the UK. In the 2016 “Brexit” referendum on whether or not to leave the European Union, Cambridge Analytica offe

citește mai mult