A Russian History Lesson

  • Rusia
  • 0
  • 7 September 2018

History has long been an object of reform since the collapse of the USSR. It has been used as an impetus for championing democratic change and explaining the chaos of the Russian Federation’s first decade. In addition, it is an important part of Vladimir Putin’s policy rhetoric to champion Russia’s ‘great powerness’ (derzhavnost’).

In the last twenty-eight years, history in schools has journeyed from one single view enforced by a strict interpretation of Marxism-Leninism, to an explosion of textbooks and debate under Boris Yeltsin and then to closer state control of an open discussion under Putin. An open discussion, it must be said, with a ‘preferred’ version of the past based upon cherry picked segments reflecting triumph, strength and unity.

It has not gone unnoticed that school history textbooks under Putin have become more praiseworthy of the nature of the state and other historical leaders who asserted authority. The infamous 2007 Filippov teacher handbook, for instance, was widely criticised for glossing over the Stalinist terror and praising him as an ‘effective manager’. The recent 2015 series also stress the need for built up, strong institutions to avoid national catastrophes, although contains no anti-western or nationalist language.

Stalin aside, history in contemporary Russia has many tasks to perform at once. As well as promoting citizenship in what is a notionally democratic state, it must explain the collapse of the USSR, experience of democracy and not to mention help the population come to terms with the more traumatic episodes of its past. Most importantly, history in Russian schools is designed to promote patriotic loyalty through past glories – namely the Great Patriotic War.

History is a profile subject – one that shapes the profile of a student. It teaches us about societal norms, traditions, the way things are and the way they ought to be. The values of the nation are portrayed through the textbooks and treat students as passive observers and members of a nation. In Russia, it is an elective subject after the age of sixteen.

A recent Levada poll showed Russians consider history to be the most important school subject, yet, history’s popularity lags behind the sciences and Maths. Also strange considering pride in Russia’s history has also topped recent polls.

History in schools has a symbolic place in contemporary Russia. Students must feel connected to their motherland but also leave school knowing how to act within it. This is why history education has become an important part of ‘upbringing’.

Russian history teachers are also kept busy and are increasingly squeezed between balancing modern pedagogical standards (obuchenie) and a child’s upbringing (vospitanie). As well as preparing students for the Unified State Exams (YeGE), teachers must also provide students with the correct knowledge and skills to enter the workplace. Since 2000, four patriotic education programmes have also impacted the history curriculum.

In general, the patriotic programmes have focused on military components, overusing words and phrases such as duty and military patriotic work. It was also hoped these would combat radicalism in the form of nationalism and terrorism. The latest patriotic programme (2016 – 2020) has focused increasingly more on national security in response to the geopolitical situation and economic conditions. Lessons and textbooks on Crimea’s history as a part of Russia were introduced after the annexation, and these focus on military aspects.

However, as Anna Sanina writes, these programmes are ‘hollow documents’ and were essentially hurried through. Performance and success is hard to measure as indicators are either not provided or so broad and ambiguous. Moreover, most schools often ‘sign off’ on these programmes and spend the money elsewhere.

Many teachers, like one school director in central Moscow I spoke to, simply have no idea what to do for patriotic programmes. One school visited in Vladimir has an Orthodox priest attend the first day of school ceremonies whereas another in Novgorod organises archeological digs for its students. For many, a museum trip will suffice.

Another teacher in Volokolamsk stated how careful one should be in teaching history patriotically. This came after I viewed her lesson on the formation of the Russian state under Ivan IV, where she stressed to her students the need for national unity among the many regions of Russia. In her own words, ‘being patriotic does not mean making the past better in our own eyes. We have to tell the truth’.

Last year was the centenary of the 1917 revolutions. The state kept this at arm’s length and made no official statement. Revolutions have negative connotations in modern Russia, and this period is associated with chaos, bloodshed and generally considered a tragedy. While school textbooks largely go along with this narrative, 1917 is also treated as two parts of one process. More importantly, one that had catastrophic consequences for the Russian state and society alike.

Russian children are growing up learning about the need for serving society and upholding traditions that underpin it. A big part of this is respect for the state organs of power that lead the countries to glories on many occasions in the past. And this is something school textbooks do not attempt to hide.

One student, Ivan, told me that monuments to Stalin are a good thing. Why? Because he modernised the economy and sent a man to space, he said. When I asked him about the terror, he described it as ‘necessary to achieve the goals of the state’. Ivan and 77% of all young people, according to a 2015 RBK poll, have in one way or another justified the terror.

The reasons why statehood (gosudarstvennost’) is being championed in contemporary Russia has something to do with the fact that the last 100 years are tarred with discontinuities. Stability and normality are sought after, and as history teaches Russian teenagers, only a strong state can guarantee this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  • 0
  • 2 July 2020


This book  , edited by Evgeny Pashentsev, brings together a series of chapters written by Russian and non-Russian scholars

citește mai mult

The Past and Contemporary Russia

  • 0
  • 18 June 2020

The breakaway region of South Ossetia announced in May that its capital, Tskhinvali, would also be known as Stalinir.  Co-naming the capital after the former Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, its president – Anatolii Bibilov – stated in his decree that the move was to 'preserve historical memory in connection with the 75th anniversary of  Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945'  – until it had

citește mai mult

Review: The Russians – A Journey From Cradle To Grave

  • 0
  • 15 April 2020

Most documentaries about Russia tend to fixate around Vladimir Putin, the former KGB spy turned president, who is clamping down on Russian society and chipping away at its democratic institutions. On occasion, we get non-Russian experts like Stacey Dooley covering the controversial, such as far right groups, anti-gay laws and domestic abuse. Every so often, one appears that actually attempts to cover normal everyday life away from the Kremlin and controversy (thou

citește mai mult

Azebaijan, cheia geostrategică a Asiei Centrale

  • 0
  • 13 February 2018

După destrămarea URSS, Azerbaijanul a fost statul ex-sovietic care alături de    republicile Baltice a avut o dezvoltare constantă și durabilă. Desigur, aici pot fi adresate unele critici regimului de la Baku cu privire la democrație, care în opinia multor analiști este doar mimată la Baku. Însă faptul adevărat este că acest stat a reușit să își gestioneze eficient resursele de care dispune pentru a deveni o societate prosperă. I se atribuie Azerbaijanului etichet

citește mai mult

What Can Democrats Learn From Alabama’s Doug Jones?

  • 0
  • 30 November 2017

In ordinary circumstances, Doug Jones would already be preparing to move to Washington DC. The former prosecutor famous for convicting KKK members for a church bombing is up against gay bashing, God and gun lovin’, twice kicked out of elected office, Judge Roy Moore. A man who has eight accusers of sexual assault, all of whom were underage at the time of the allegations.

Yet, if one looks at all the recent polls, they show a ti

citește mai mult

Azerbaidjanul, petrolul și românii

  • 0
  • 7 October 2016

Întotdeauna, statele sunt nevoite să își apere poziția pe marea tablă a geopoliticii, uitându-se cu grijă la vecini, dar și la puterile regionale. Această regulă presupune nu doar poziția ofensivă, ci și valorificare atuurilor, astfel încât să devină piese care contează pe „câmpul de analiză”, iar nu elemente neglijabile, care sunt măturate dintr-o dată de cei ce au suficientă putere să mânuiască piesele.

Caucazul, ca regiune geopolitică, nu face nici ea excepție

citește mai mult

Coronavirus Pandemics, Huawei 5G Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and Psychological Operations

  • 0
  • 21 April 2020

Introduction  [1]

The United States is gradually and more clearly losing its first place in scientific and technological progress and innovation to China. One of the latest examples of this: the World Intellectual Property Organization, which oversees a system for countries to share recognition of patents, said 58,990 applications were filed from China last year, overtaking the United States which filed 57,

citește mai mult

Impeached: a detailed look at the ambiguous role of the Chief Justice

  • 0
  • 12 January 2020

The House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on two counts; abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. It must now settle on a team of 'impeachment managers' to make the case against President Trump in a trial. The House is set transfer impeachment over to the Senate for said trial in the coming days.

The United States Senate has the power to try all impeachments and must do so under oath or affirmation

citește mai mult

A scandal is brewing between Qatar and the United Arab Emirates

  • 0
  • 24 July 2019

The Al Arabiya news agency, citing the New York Times, has published information about Qatar’s involvement in the terrorist attacks in Somalia on objects belonging to the United Arab Emirates.

In particular, the article deals with secret negotiations between Qatari entrepreneur Khalif Kayed al-Muhanadi and Qatar’s ambassador to Somalia, Hassan bin Hamza Hashem. During this conversation, which took place on May 18, 2019 and whos

citește mai mult